![]() |
|||||
Proven Validity |
|||||
|
Extensive tests conducted over 15 years by fitness experts including Dr. Esar Shvartz, on over 100 male and female subjects ages 6 to 81 years have shown the following: |
|||||
| The UFT provides a good prediction of Vo2 max. This was determined in 46 males and 46 females, ages 6 to 78 years. The correlation coefficient between the UFT values and values obtained from direct measurement of Vo2 max (using 15-minute step tests), is r = 0.93 with a standard error of +/-7 %. This means that in 68 cases out of 100, the error in the prediction of Vo2 max will not exceed +/- 7 %. For example, if your absolute Vo2 max is 2.5 liters/min the standard e rror is +/- 0.18 liters/min. | The UFT is very reliable, very similar results are obtained upon repeated testing. The correlation coefficient between two UFTs taken a few minutes apart is r = 0.96 with a standard error of 5 %. This was also determined in the above 92 male and female subjects. | ||||
|
The UFT accuracy is similar to that of blood pressure measured with a sphygmomanometer (inflated cuff), which does not always represent the true pressure inside the artery, and is influenced by operator's errors. In a similar way, the UFT provides only a prediction of maximal oxygen uptake, and it is influenced by the accuracy of heart rate monitoring during the test. |
|||||
|
Home | Company | Online Store | Support | Fitness Info | Links Determine
Fitness | Proven Validity | Exercise
Prescription Copyright © 1999 VividSoft™. All rights reserved. Send all questions and comments regarding this site to webmaster@vividsoft.com
|
|||||